- Unbuilding Africa
- Posts
- Why Bids Are Your Best Marketing Tool to Winning Projects in Kenya
Why Bids Are Your Best Marketing Tool to Winning Projects in Kenya
Africa’s construction market is booming, with tenders worth KSh 50M–500M driving Kenya’s Vision 2030 and beyond.
Yet many mid-tier firms lose these high-stakes contracts due to disorganized bid processes, weak financials, or misaligned submissions.
In leading teams to secure $100M+ in contracts with large organizations like The World Bank, Total Energies, Kenya Pipeline Company (KPC), and the Kenya Urban Roads Authority (KURA), I have come to understand what truly makes a winning bid, and what doesn’t.
In this article, we discuss:
Why Bidding is Superior to Traditional Advertising
7 Things No One Tells You About Winning High-Value Tenders in Kenya
How to Increase Your Bid-to-win Rate
Additional Resources
WHY BIDDING IS SUPERIOR TO TRADITIONAL ADVERTISING
Bids are the lifeblood of Engineering and Construction (E&C) firms; a lost tender means millions in revenue gone. But winning them is tough.
Unlike Fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), which rely on emotional advertising to drive impulse purchases, or Software-as-a-Service (SaaS), which uses feature-driven digital campaigns to convert users, E&C bidding is a high-stakes, committee-driven process where decision-makers (procurement officers, technical advisors, and financiers) scrutinize proposals for compliance, feasibility, and value.
Clients like Kenya Roads Board demand robust balance sheets, competitive costs, and ESG compliance, and projects are awarded through rigorous tender processes evaluated by:
Government agencies
Corporates
Multilateral funders like the African Development Bank (AfDB)
While generic marketing materials (such as brochures or social media ads) may raise awareness, they lack the depth needed to address specific tender requirements.
7 THINGS NO ONE TELLS YOU ABOUT WINNING HIGH VALUE TENDERS IN KENYA
1. Bid Bonds and Guarantees Are the Real Bottlenecks
Many mid-sized E&C firms technically qualify to bid, but few meet the financial requirements like bid security, performance bonds, or advance payment guarantees.
These instruments, often demanded by international donors like the World Bank, are challenging in markets with unstable banking systems. It is not uncommon for firms to lose bids due to unapproved bank guarantees, despite strong technical proposals.
Access to credible financial partners is a competitive edge, enabling you to clear these bottlenecks and signal reliability to both corporate and government clients.
2. Joint Ventures (JVs) Are Political Strategies
Foreign firms often secure big tenders by forming joint ventures (JVs) with local partners to meet content rules and gain favor with politically connected stakeholders.
However, misaligned JVs can derail projects (for instance, when partners clash over profit splits.
Equally critical is navigating conflicts between local regulations (e.g., NCA licensing) and donor procurement rules (e.g., World Bank guidelines).
Experts balance dual compliance to avoid disqualification or political fallout, ensuring bids align with both local ministries and international funders.
3. Successful Bids Are Pre-Won Through Pre-Bid Influence
Success tendering often depends on relationships built before the Request for Proposal (RFP) is released.
Serious contenders engage early in workshops, technical committees, or industry forums, mapping stakeholders (government officials, procurement officers, or community leaders) to align with their priorities.
During evaluation, human factors play a critical role, as committees with political appointees, engineers, and financiers weigh soft criteria like trust and risk tolerance.
Sometimes, bids with near-identical technical scores will be decided by a bidder’s ability to address a key evaluator’s concerns, like local job creation, giving them the edge.
Success hinges on this pre-positioning, not the bid document itself.
4. Avoid the Underbidding Trap with Balanced Pricing
Cash-strapped firms often underbid to win tenders, but this tactic backfires, leading to contract variations, disputes, or blacklisting.
Sophisticated bidders balance commercial viability with competitive pricing, leaving room for contingencies like material price hikes.
In my experience, firms that bid sustainably (factoring in 5-10% contingencies) avoid the pitfalls of disputes and maintain credibility with clients like the African Development Bank, securing long-term opportunities.
P.S.
If your firm needs a ready-to-use, repeatable tool for bid submissions, my Master Bid Template is a FREE, highly practical solution for Kenyan firms looking to optimize and standardize their submissions. It’s particularly effective for mid-sized firms with existing but inconsistent bidding workflows, as it reduces errors and speeds up response times.
5. Bids Are About Managing Risk, Not Just Price
Experts read RFPs not just for scope but to identify risks like supply chain delays or currency fluctuations, then develop robust contingencies.
High-value tenders, especially PPPs (Public Private Partnerships) or EPC+F (Engineering, Procurement, Construction + Financing) contracts are designed to transfer significant project risks to contractors.
Winning bidders position their technical proposals as client-focused solutions that de-risk the project, offering multiple suppliers, logistics backups, or social impact plans to build goodwill.
6. Prioritize Cash Flow Modelling Over Profit Margins
In Africa, payment delays are common. Experienced bidders focus on cash flow per project milestone, not just total revenue or profit.
Using tools like Primavera or Excel, the best teams model cash inflows and outflows to avoid negative phases, which can sink a project long before profitability matters.
Sometimes you may need to renegotiate payment terms upfront, ensuring liquidity during delays later on. This approach keeps operations afloat, even when final margins are tight, and signals financial savvy to evaluators.
7. Treat Bidding as a Core Business Function
Top firms don’t treat bidding as administrative work; they see it as a revenue-driving capability.
It is useful to invest in bid libraries to reuse past proposals, employ full-time bid teams (estimators, writers, compliance experts), and use tools to automate performance tracking. Engaging in post-bid views also helps you refine future submissions.
When you shift from last-minute scrambles to structured processes, you could increase your win rates by 20-30%, turning bidding into a strategic advantage.
HOW TO INCREASE YOUR BID-TO-WIN RATE
To compete for KSh 50M–500M tenders in Kenya’s booming construction market, mid-tier E&C firms must treat bidding as a core business function, not an afterthought.
Many firms lose out due to underinvestment in bid preparation, missing the expertise or resources to craft compelling, compliant proposals.
Here’s what it takes to get it right:
1. In-House Bid Teams (The Ideal Setup)
Building a dedicated bid team (estimators, technical writers, and compliance specialists) ensures consistency and strategic alignment. Annual costs for a small team (2-3 staff) range from KSh 3M–6M (salaries, training, software like Primavera). Top firms I’ve worked with allocate 15-20% of their marketing budget to bid optimization, treating it as a revenue driver. This investment pays off by streamlining processes and boosting win rates.
2. Outsourcing Expertise (When You Need a Boost)
If your firm lacks in-house capacity, outsourcing to bid consultants or technical writers is a game-changer. For major tenders, costs range from KSh 500,000–5M ($5,000–$50,000) per bid, depending on complexity and expertise (e.g., international consultants for AfDB-funded projects). We sometimes see win rates increase by as much as 20-30% when leveraging specialists to refine risk models, polish technical proposals, or navigate donor compliance.
Skimping on bid preparation (relying on generic templates or overstretched staff) leads to disqualifications or uncompetitive bids. It is not uncommon for firms to lose tenders over simple errors like incomplete bid bonds or misaligned ESG commitments. Investing upfront mitigates these risks and positions your firm as a trusted partner.
By prioritizing bid preparation, you address the pitfalls many overlook, from weak financials to misreading RFP nuances, giving you an edge in Kenya’s competitive tender market.
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
For E&C firms looking for a foundational resource to master bidding, Smartsheet’s Master Guide to Construction Bidding offers templates, best practices, and strategies for winning tenders.
While Kenya-specific resources like NCA guidelines or PPRA documents provide critical compliance frameworks, they lack the strategic depth needed to outshine competitors. Smartsheet’s guide offers a broader, strategic framework.
P.S.
A big part of my day job is helping mid-sized Engineering & Construction firms figure out why their growth has stalled. The symptoms are often clear, but the root causes are usually hidden.
Over time, I built a structured framework (The E&C Growth Index) to quickly uncover bottlenecks across 5 critical business areas. If you're curious what's holding your firm back, take the test. You'll get a personalized report in under 5 minutes, straight to your inbox.














Reply